Independent AI research

Intelligence,
recursively
reimagined.

A compact, repetition-resistant language model built from a self-similar tree over channels.

MANIPULATE FORM
DRAG TO ROTATE · SHIFT + WHEEL TO ZOOM
FRACTAL DEPTH05FINITE / RECURSIVE
SCROLL TO DESCEND ↓
01 / PREMISE

Instead of stacking layers, FractalPI processes language at many channel scales inside one finite tree.

02 / ARCHITECTURE

Split. Process.
Route. Return.

Each token keeps its full representation. Its channels are divided into progressively smaller groups, processed at six scales, then merged back through the transpose of the learned route.

FRACTAL TREE BLOCK · SWIPE OR HOVER TO EXPLORE
05
01

1 → 2D channel groups

02

ContextRouter assigns every token

03

Down/up weights are shared

03 / MEASURED EVIDENCE

Smaller—not
magically better.

The experiments support a narrower, more useful claim: FractalPI leads its size class and resists repetition at conservative learning rates. The larger dense model still achieves the best single-pass loss.

COMPACTNESS / 300M TOKENSH2
40%fewer parameters
at matched width
FractalPI76.4M params · 0.25G FLOPs/token
BPB 1.335±.004
Dense 6L127.0M params · 0.28G FLOPs/token
BPB 1.279±.0004

Lower BPB is better. FractalPI does not reach parity with the 1.7× larger dense model; it outperforms the paper’s parameter- and FLOP-matched structural controls.

SAME 20M TOKENS · 16 PASSESH1
3×less degradation
from own minimum

Matched total capacity: 133M fractal vs 127M dense, one run per model, conservative LR. This is resistance to generalization collapse—not immunity to memorization.

PARAMETER MEMORY AT SCALEWIDTH
40%parameter saving
vs dense 6L
MODEL WIDTH d1,024
1,0242,0484,0968,192
FRACTALPI76.4M
DENSE 6L127.0M
48 GB GPU

Both models fit at this width.

The model estimates follow the paper’s embedding + quadratic block scaling. At d=8192, the reported 5.2B dense optimizer state is ≈78 GB; the 2.0B fractal still trains at batch 1.

CONTEXTROUTERMECHANISM
≈0.2%of assignment variance explained by token identity

Routing is per token and context-conditioned. Replacing it with a static permutation costs +0.37 BPB—the largest ablation in the paper.

READ METHODS, CONTROLS & LIMITATIONSOPEN THE 22-PAGE PAPER ↗
04 / WHAT REMAINS OPEN

Evidence,
with boundaries.

The current study reaches 133M parameters. These are promising measurements, not a theorem of fractal intelligence.

300M+NEXT TEST / 01

Do compactness and repetition resistance hold at larger scale?

MULTI-SEED VALIDATION
D→NEXT TEST / 02

Does greater fractal depth strengthen the effect?

DEPTH UNDER REPETITION
⌁LIMITATION / 01

Grouped operations remain slower in bf16 despite lower memory use.

KERNEL EFFICIENCY
≠LIMITATION / 02

Exact long-range copying still trails a matched-loss dense model.

RETRIEVAL
05 / RESEARCH LINEAGE

Science before
the system.

FractalPI grows from years of research at the intersection of nonlinear dynamics, complex systems and intelligent computation.

FULL GOOGLE SCHOLAR PROFILE ↗
THE NEXT SCALE OF INTELLIGENCE

Go deeper.

Explore a new geometry for machine intelligence.